A newly released congressional redistricting proposal in Texas is sparking strong reactions from lawmakers and advocates as it seeks to reshape political boundaries and expand Republican influence in the state. The proposal comes just four years after Texas completed its once-a-decade redistricting process following the 2020 U.S. Census — a move that is unusual and already drawing scrutiny over its timing and intent.

The new map aims to increase Republican-held congressional seats from 25 to 30 by redrawing districts currently held by Democrats, particularly in urban areas such as Houston, San Antonio, and Dallas. It also moves Democratic Representatives Henry Cuellar and Vicente Gonzalez into districts that former President Donald Trump won by double digits, effectively making those seats more favorable to Republican challengers.

In Houston, the proposed changes would not eliminate Congressman Al Green’s seat, but would dramatically reshape it. Green’s 9th Congressional District, which he has represented since 2005, would be redrawn to include significantly more white and Latino voters while reducing the number of Black voters — a shift that changes the demographic composition of a district long known for its strong African American representation. The revised district would now include areas of eastern Harris County and would have favored Trump by 15 points in the 2020 presidential election.

In a statement issued on Wednesday, July 30, Congressman Green responded to the proposal, saying:

“Today, I received what appears to be the proposed redistricting congressional lines for Texas. Of the many points that can be made, I shall call three to the attention of the public now and more later. Point one: the map is extreme invidious discrimination and accomplishes what the President has demanded of the Governor and more. Two, the DOJ demanded that the race card be played, and the Governor dealt the people of Texas a racist hand. Three, I will be on the ballot and will announce more of my intentionality after I have engaged in deliberations.”

The unusual timing of the redistricting effort — outside of the typical post-census window — is expected to lead to legal challenges and extensive public debate. While redistricting is required every ten years following the national census, states can redraw lines more frequently if the legislature approves it. Critics argue that this new proposal is politically motivated and could dilute minority voting strength in key districts.

Public hearings and potential lawsuits are likely as the proposal moves through the legislative process. If enacted, the changes could significantly alter Texas’s congressional delegation and impact representation for diverse communities across the state.